Should the U.S. Return the Statue of Liberty- A French Lawmaker Thinks So

The Statue of Liberty is one of the most iconic symbols of freedom, democracy, and American identity. Standing tall in New York Harbor, this colossal monument has welcomed immigrants, inspired generations, and represented the ideals of liberty since its dedication in 1886. However, a recent statement by French Member of the European Parliament Raphaël Glucksmann has sparked an unusual debate—should the United States return the Statue of Liberty to France?

Glucksmann's argument hinges on the idea that the United States no longer upholds the values the statue represents. During a political event, he criticized certain U.S. policies, including reduced support for Ukraine and funding cuts to scientific institutions. According to him, these actions contradict the fundamental principles of democracy and liberty, making America an unworthy steward of the statute.

His statement has stirred reactions on both sides of the Atlantic, with some viewing it as a symbolic critique rather than a serious proposal. Others see it as an exaggerated response to contemporary geopolitical concerns. The question remains: does a nation's changing policies justify the return of a historical gift?

A Gift with a Purpose

The Statue of Liberty was a gift from France to the United States in 1886, commemorating the centennial of American independence and celebrating the nation’s shared democratic values. Designed by French sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi and built with the engineering expertise of Gustave Eiffel, the statue was intended to serve as a beacon of freedom and hope.

Over the years, it has taken on a broader meaning, particularly for immigrants arriving in the U.S. seeking a better life. The famous inscription at its base, featuring Emma Lazarus’s poem, welcomes the "huddled masses yearning to breathe free." Its message has historically aligned with America’s role as a land of opportunity and refuge.

If the United States were to return the statue, what would that mean for its symbolic power? The Statue of Liberty is not just a representation of Franco-American relations—it has transcended national identities to become a global emblem of freedom. Even if some American policies seem to diverge from its original ideals, removing the statue would not necessarily restore those values

elsewhere.

Moreover, the repatriation of historical gifts is a complicated issue. Many cultural artifacts reside in countries different from their origins, and debates over rightful ownership often arise. However, in the case of the Statue of Liberty, its placement was deliberate, and its meaning has evolved far beyond its French origins.

While Glucksmann’s statement may not lead to any official action, it does prompt an important discussion about democracy, values, and the responsibilities of nations. The debate isn’t just about a statue—it’s about what it represents and whether the United States continues to embody those ideals.

Rather than focusing on returning the statue, perhaps the real challenge is for America to reaffirm its commitment to liberty, justice, and democracy, ensuring that the monument remains a symbol of hope for generations to come.

What do you think? Should the U.S. return the Statue of Liberty, or should it serve as a reminder of the ideals that must continually be upheld?